47°F
weather icon Cloudy

Things HOA boards should consider during COVID reopening

There is a lot of confusion out there concerning COVID-19 reopening protocols and how it affects our homeowners associations. Communities across the valley are struggling with how best to address this situation. I have invited Las Vegas attorneys Michael T. Schulman, Gregory P. Kerr and David Stern to weigh in on this very important subject.

On May 3, Gov. Steve Sisolak issued his new directive (No. 45), essentially aligning the state mandates with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. Two important things for community associations to keep in mind are that:

1. The mask mandate is not gone.

2. Counties and private businesses are still permitted to implement heightened restrictions if they so choose. The governor’s mandates are a floor, not a ceiling.

What the governor’s new directive actually means:

In clarifying some of the confusion regarding the scope of Directive 45, the governor did not entirely rescind the mask mandate. In fact, Directive 45 is clear that, as a general rule, masks are still required.

The directive does, however, state that in addition to the previous exemptions listed in Directive 24, further exemptions are provided for based on the current and future CDC guidelines.

Here’s the good news for associations and members:

Individuals who have been fully vaccinated (two weeks after the second dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines or two weeks after a single-dose vaccine such as the Johnson &Johnson vaccine), or are otherwise exempt, are permitted to resume activities without wearing a mask.

Best practices: What should community associations do?

In light of the immunity protections offered by Senate Bill 04, and with the governor’s latest directive, there are difficult burdens that a potential plaintiff would have to overcome before an association could be found liable for COVID-related claims, so long as associations adhere to local county guidelines (including capacity limits) and post signage where appropriate that reflect the CDC guidelines.

Associations are not expected to be the “COVID Police” and are not required — or expected — to confirm whether an individual was actually vaccinated.

However, it is important to inform members that masks are required for persons who have not been fully vaccinated and that the association requires members to adhere to the county and CDC guidelines. Use of signage and other means of communication with the membership (e.g., eblasts, websites, newsletters, etc.) informing them of the new mask requirements under Directive 45 is very important.

Finally, the Nevada Health Response is unequivocal that COVID is still a threat. Community associations have a duty to act in accordance with applicable directives and any local government requirements when it comes to opening access to common area facilities and amenities.

Despite the positive trends, associations need to remember that government restrictions still apply. Masks are still required unless exempted by vaccine or otherwise, social distancing (3 feet) still applies to those who have not been vaccinated and are not of the same household, and capacity limits are still restricted to 80 percent capacity in Clark County. Associations will have to balance the desires of the members with this duty while continuing to implement heightened cleaning services and maintain other COVID protocols.

The opinions expressed in this guest column are from the authors. As always, communities should contact their legal counsel.

Barbara Holland is a certified property manager and holds the supervisory community manager certificate with the state of Nevada. She is an author and educator on real estate management. Questions may be sent to holland744o@gmail.com.

THE LATEST
Federal ruling temporarily blocks Corporate Transparency Act

Community Associations Institute applauds the Dec. 3 decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al. to issue a preliminary nationwide injunction against the Corporate Transparency Act.

Disabled vet’s wife upset about flags improperly displayed

You may want to contact one of the local branch offices of the United States Armed Forces for assistance. Perhaps you could obtain a formal letter from them concerning the flying of the United States flag.

Here is what the law says about service animals

Your board can contact the local Department of Housing and Urban Development office to discuss the specifics of your association, such as these dogs who may possess a possible threat to another individual.

Pahrump community has questions about new development

Under Nevada Revised Statutes 116.3108 (2), an association shall hold a special meeting of the unit owners to address any matter affecting the community if at least 10 percent or any lower percentage specified in the bylaws of the total number of votes in the association request that the secretary call such a meeting.

HOA assessments keep increasing

You would need to review the governing documents of the association as to the percent increase the board can assess, with or without homeowner approval.

Legal action continues over Corporate Transparency Act’s reach

Thomas M. Skiba, CAE, is the CEO for Community Associations Institute. In today’s column he gives a very important update regarding Community Associations Institute v. U.S. Department of Treasury. This challenges the Corporate Transparency Act and its applicability to community associations nationwide.

Trash days always seem to be windy days

You could write a personal letter to each board member asking them to address the trash issue by proposing a regulation that all trash must be in containers or in proper trash bags.

HOA board cannot arbitrary enforce violations

Under subsection 4 of this law, the board’s decision to enforce one set of circumstances does not prevent the board from taking enforcement action under another set of circumstances but the board may not be arbitrary or capricious in taking enforcement action.

HOA board members must disclose conflict of interest

Under the law, each HOA board candidate must make a good faith effort to disclose any financial, business, professional or personal relationship or interest that would result or appeal to a reasonable person to result in potential conflict of interest in serving on the board.