DATABASE
Clark County lawyers rated 89 judges for the Las Vegas Review-Journal's 2019 Judicial Performance Evaluation. The RJ partnered with the Women's Research Institute of Nevada and the UNLV Cannon Survey Center to process the results. Here's what the scores mean:
Retention score: This represents the percentage of respondents who answered "yes" when asked whether the judge should be retained on the bench.
Summary score: Researchers funneled the average answer for each of the survey's performance-related questions into evenly-weighted categories, then determined each category's average. "No opinion" responses were excluded. This across-the-board score was calculated using the category averages, resulting in the final weighted average — a score between 1 and 5.
Henderson Municipal Court
Burr was appointed to the Henderson Municipal Court in 2016 after the death of Diana Hampton. He ran unopposed in 2017, and he is up for reelection in 2024.
39 retention responses for this judge
95 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.6
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree74 %
4.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree74 %
4.5
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral5 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.5
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral3 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.6
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree81 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree8 %
Strongly Agree84 %
4.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree83 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree76 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree75 %
4.6
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree82 %
4.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree78 %
4.5
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral5 %
Agree8 %
Strongly Agree78 %
4.7
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree83 %
2013 survey
90 %
Retention Recommendation
( then a Henderson justice of the peace )
Minimize
North Las Vegas Justice Court
A North Las Vegas justice of the peace since 2013, Hoo is up for reelection in 2024.
50 retention responses for this judge
94 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral8 %
Agree37 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
48 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral6 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
47 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral11 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
48 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral8 %
Agree40 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.5
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
44 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral5 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
45 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral7 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
44 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral4 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
44 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral4 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
44 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.5
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
44 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral5 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4.6
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
45 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral4 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.5
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
44 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
45 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral9 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree60 %
2013 survey
91 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Henderson Justice Court
Former Henderson City Councilman Sam Bateman was elected to the Henderson Justice Court in 2016. He is up for reelection in 2022.
67 retention responses for this judge
93 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.5
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral1 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.5
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral3 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
63 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral3 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
63 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral3 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.5
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral2 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral2 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral2 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree72 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree71 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral3 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.6
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral2 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree72 %
4.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral2 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.5
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree65 %
4.5
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree64 %
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
Chelini was elected to Las Vegas Justice Court in 2016. She is up for reelection in 2022.
79 retention responses for this judge
92 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.5
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
75 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral1 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral8 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral5 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral5 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree65 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral3 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree72 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
70 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral4 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
68 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral4 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.5
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral4 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.6
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral3 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.6
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral4 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.5
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral3 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree74 %
Minimize
Las Vegas Municipal Court
A Las Vegas municipal judge since 1999, Brown was most recently reelected in 2015. He is up for reelection in 2021.
51 retention responses for this judge
92 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.7
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
51 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral0 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree76 %
4.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral2 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree71 %
4.5
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral6 %
Agree8 %
Strongly Agree76 %
4.7
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral2 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree76 %
4.7
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral2 %
Agree12 %
Strongly Agree80 %
4.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral2 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree80 %
4.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral4 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree80 %
4.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
47 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral0 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree83 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral0 %
Agree12 %
Strongly Agree78 %
4.7
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral0 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree80 %
4.8
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral2 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree82 %
4.7
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
48 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral2 %
Agree10 %
Strongly Agree83 %
4.7
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral4 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree76 %
2013 survey
89 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Elected in 2008 to Clark County Family Court, Duckworth previously practiced family law. Duckworth is up for reelection in 2020.
90 retention responses for this judge
92 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.6
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral1 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree72 %
4.5
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
88 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral2 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
87 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral1 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.5
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
88 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral3 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.6
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
87 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral0 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree71 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
82 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral1 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral3 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral5 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
84 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral5 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.7
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
87 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral0 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree79 %
4.7
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral0 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree79 %
4.5
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral6 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.6
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral2 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree71 %
2013 survey
93 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Henderson Justice Court
First elected to the Henderson Justice Court in 2000, George is up for reelection in 2020.
62 retention responses for this judge
92 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.5
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
61 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral3 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
59 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral2 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
58 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral5 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.5
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
58 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral2 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.5
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral4 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree72 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral4 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree72 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral2 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree72 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral0 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree71 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral0 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree73 %
4.7
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral0 %
Agree12 %
Strongly Agree84 %
4.8
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral0 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree81 %
4.6
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.7
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral4 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree79 %
2013 survey
91 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2006, Williams was retained by voters and last reelected in 2014. He is up for reelection in 2020.
231 retention responses for this judge
90 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
226 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral5 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.3
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
226 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral6 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.1
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
226 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral9 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.3
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
224 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral6 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
222 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral8 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
213 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral2 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
211 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral4 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
204 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral4 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
219 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral7 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.6
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
225 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral2 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree71 %
4.6
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
226 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral3 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
221 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral9 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.5
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
227 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral5 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree61 %
2013 survey
84 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Nevada Supreme Court
Elected to the state Supreme Court in 2018, Cadish previously served as a Clark County district judge for more than a decade. She is up for reelection in 2024.
248 retention responses for this judge
89 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.6
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
223 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
227 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral5 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
224 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral7 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
224 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral5 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4.5
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
226 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral4 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
219 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral5 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
220 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral6 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
214 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral8 %
Agree10 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
226 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral7 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.6
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
230 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral6 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree69 %
2013 survey
87 %
Retention Recommendation
( then a Clark County district judge )
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
A lifelong Henderson resident, Gibson was appointed in 2018 to Clark County Family Court after working for six years as a juvenile dependency hearing master. He is up for reelection in 2020.
73 retention responses for this judge
88 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
70 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral11 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.1
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.1
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral9 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral6 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral3 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral6 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
59 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral6 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral3 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral6 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
68 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral3 %
Agree43 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
68 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral4 %
Agree41 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.2
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral7 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree48 %
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Sullivan was elected in 2008 to Clark County Family Court, presiding over child welfare cases. He previously worked for 12 years in Family Court in various roles. Sullivan is up for reelection in 2020.
62 retention responses for this judge
87 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
58 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral5 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.3
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral3 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4.3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4.4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
56 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.5
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral2 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree73 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral2 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree71 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral4 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree72 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral4 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree72 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree9 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral2 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral2 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree74 %
4.3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral4 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral4 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree67 %
2013 survey
90 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Wiese was elected to the Clark County District Court in 2010 and was reelected in 2014. He is up for reelection in 2020.
255 retention responses for this judge
87 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.3
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
240 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral9 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
238 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral7 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
237 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral8 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.2
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
238 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral8 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
236 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral8 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
224 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral5 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
222 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral5 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
216 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral6 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
231 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral9 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.5
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
238 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral3 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
238 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral5 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
236 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral6 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
234 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral5 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree53 %
2013 survey
80 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 1998, Denton was retained by voters and last reelected in 2014. He is up for reelection in 2020.
193 retention responses for this judge
87 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
189 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral8 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
188 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
187 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral11 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
187 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral15 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
188 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral4 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
179 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
175 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral5 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
175 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
182 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.6
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
189 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral6 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
187 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral8 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.2
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
186 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral12 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.3
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
187 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral7 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree52 %
2013 survey
93 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
Appointed to Las Vegas Justice Court in 2009, Sciscento is up for reelection in 2024.
96 retention responses for this judge
86 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.3
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
91 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral7 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.2
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral7 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.1
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
90 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral9 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.2
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral12 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral9 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
87 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral7 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral6 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
80 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral12 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral8 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral3 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.3
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
88 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral7 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree63 %
2013 survey
89 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Municipal Court
First elected to the Las Vegas Municipal Court in 2007, Hastings was reelected in 2015. He is up for reelection in 2021.
56 retention responses for this judge
86 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.3
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral5 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral5 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.3
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral9 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral4 %
Agree9 %
Strongly Agree75 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree75 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree76 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree9 %
Strongly Agree71 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral4 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree71 %
4.6
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral4 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree76 %
4.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral4 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree74 %
4.6
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral4 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree78 %
4.6
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree71 %
2013 survey
89 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
First elected in 2018 to Las Vegas Justice Court, De La Garza currently presides over one of the court's domestic battery calendars. She is up for reelection in 2024.
59 retention responses for this judge
86 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
58 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral2 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
56 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral4 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral5 %
Agree12 %
Strongly Agree65 %
4.3
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
56 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral4 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral2 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral6 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
52 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral2 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral4 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral4 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral4 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.5
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral5 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree65 %
4.4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral4 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree65 %
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2016, Jones was retained by voters in 2018. He is up for reelection in 2020.
142 retention responses for this judge
85 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
139 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
137 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral5 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
136 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral9 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree39 %
4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
134 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral8 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
134 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral7 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
118 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral7 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
121 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral8 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
119 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral10 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
130 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral9 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4.1
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
136 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral10 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
134 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral4 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
134 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral4 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.2
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
133 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral6 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree49 %
Minimize
Henderson Municipal Court
First elected to the Henderson Municipal Court in 2003, Hedger was reelected in 2009 and 2015. He is up for reelection in 2022.
33 retention responses for this judge
85 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.3
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
32 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral6 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
31 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral10 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
31 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral13 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree45 %
3.9
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
31 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral6 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
31 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral6 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
31 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral6 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
31 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral6 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
30 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral10 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
31 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
31 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral13 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.2
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
31 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral10 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.2
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
31 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral6 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
31 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral10 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree48 %
2013 survey
88 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2005, Herndon was retained by voters and last reelected in 2014. He is up for reelection in 2020.
194 retention responses for this judge
85 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.5
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
188 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral2 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
187 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral6 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
186 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral6 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
187 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral4 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.3
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
185 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral4 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
180 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral6 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
178 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
171 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
183 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral5 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
186 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral5 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
186 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral6 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
184 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
184 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral5 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree62 %
2013 survey
81 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Allf was elected to the Clark County District Court in 2010 and ran unopposed in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
206 retention responses for this judge
85 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.3
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
203 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral4 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
203 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral7 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree52 %
3.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
203 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral10 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree41 %
4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
202 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral12 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree44 %
4.3
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
202 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral9 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
194 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
191 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
185 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral6 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
198 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral9 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.5
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
202 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral3 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree65 %
4.4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
201 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral5 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
201 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral7 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4.2
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
201 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral9 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree51 %
2013 survey
77 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Giuliani was elected to Clark County Family Court in 2008. She previously maintained her own law practice in Las Vegas. She is up for reelection in 2020.
67 retention responses for this judge
84 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral6 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.9
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral5 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.7
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral9 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.8
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral6 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree37 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral8 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral9 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral6 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
60 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral8 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree52 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
63 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral8 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree41 %
4.4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral6 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral6 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree55 %
3.7
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral11 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree35 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
63 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral9 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree42 %
2013 survey
74 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Municipal Court
First appointed to the Las Vegas Municipal Court in 2008, Chief Judge Cynthia Leung was retained by voters in 2009 and reelected in 2015. She is up for reelection in 2021.
38 retention responses for this judge
84 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral5 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.3
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral8 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.1
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
34 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral6 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral6 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.3
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
34 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral12 %
Agree9 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral8 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree78 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral11 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree75 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
34 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral8 %
Agree8 %
Strongly Agree75 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral11 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral8 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.6
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
35 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral11 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree74 %
4.3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral6 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.3
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral11 %
Agree8 %
Strongly Agree69 %
2013 survey
75 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Nevada Supreme Court
Chief Justice Mark Gibbons has served on the state Supreme Court since he was elected in 2002. He is up for reelection in 2020.
178 retention responses for this judge
83 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.1
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
158 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral10 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
158 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral14 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
157 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral15 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.9
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
155 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral15 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree35 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
154 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral11 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
153 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral10 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
152 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral11 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
144 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral10 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
153 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral11 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.5
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
155 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree58 %
2013 survey
86 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Municipal Court
A longtime former prosecutor, Campbell was elected to the Las Vegas Municipal Court in 2017 after a highly contested race. She is up for reelection in 2024.
38 retention responses for this judge
82 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.5
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral5 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.2
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral5 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree65 %
4.2
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral3 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral6 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4.3
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral3 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral3 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral3 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
35 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral3 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree72 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral5 %
Agree8 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral0 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral0 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree70 %
4.4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral0 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral0 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree70 %
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Adair was first elected to the Clark County District Court in 2002 and was last reelected in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
161 retention responses for this judge
81 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.1
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
159 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral7 %
Agree39 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.9
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
158 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral9 %
Agree37 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.8
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
157 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral12 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.8
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
158 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral12 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree33 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
156 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral9 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
152 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral9 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
149 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral9 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
144 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral9 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree48 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
152 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral9 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.9
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
156 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral9 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.1
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
153 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral8 %
Agree39 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
156 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral9 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.9
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
156 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral11 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree39 %
2013 survey
78 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
First elected to Las Vegas Justice Court in 2008, Goodman is up for reelection in 2020.
70 retention responses for this judge
80 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral4 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
70 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral7 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree51 %
3.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
70 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral9 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral3 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral5 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral10 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral3 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
61 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree65 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree55 %
3.9
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral10 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral9 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral10 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree58 %
2013 survey
74 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Nevada Supreme Court
Appointed to the state Supreme Court in 2016, Stiglich was retained by voters in 2018. She previously served as a Washoe County district judge. Stiglich is up for reelection in 2024.
181 retention responses for this judge
80 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.3
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
154 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral4 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
152 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral8 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
152 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral8 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.2
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
150 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion15 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral7 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.3
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
152 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral10 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
146 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion16 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral8 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
149 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral7 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
139 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion19 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral7 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
151 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral7 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
156 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral8 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree59 %
Minimize
Court of Appeals
Gibbons was appointed to the inaugural Court of Appeals in 2014 after serving as a district judge for 20 years. He is up for relection in 2022.
74 retention responses for this judge
80 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.8
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral13 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.8
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral13 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree37 %
3.7
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral12 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.8
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral11 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree37 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
61 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral13 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
58 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion15 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral12 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree41 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
58 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral12 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
56 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion18 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral13 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree40 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
59 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral10 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree41 %
4.2
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
61 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral12 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree46 %
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2017, Jones was retained by voters in 2018. She is up for reelection in 2020.
190 retention responses for this judge
80 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
184 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
185 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral8 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree50 %
3.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
184 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral6 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
182 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral5 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
180 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral8 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
171 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
168 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral8 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
164 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral8 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
176 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral6 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.1
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
181 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral8 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
183 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral7 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
183 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral7 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
182 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral5 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree51 %
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Appointed in 1998 to Clark County Family Court, Voy previously spent 10 years in private practice in Las Vegas. Voy is up for reelection in 2020.
56 retention responses for this judge
80 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.6
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral7 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.9
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
52 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral6 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree46 %
3.6
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
52 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral9 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.6
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
52 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral11 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree33 %
4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
50 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral8 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree44 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral4 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
48 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral8 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral2 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree48 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
50 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral12 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.9
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
50 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral8 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral4 %
Agree37 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.2
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
47 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree24 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral6 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree30 %
4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral6 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree43 %
2013 survey
72 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
Letizia was elected to Las Vegas Justice Court in 2016. Prior to her election, she served as a chief deputy public defender in Clark County. She is up for reelection in 2022.
78 retention responses for this judge
79 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
76 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral11 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
74 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral11 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
74 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral5 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.1
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
74 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral12 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral10 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
70 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral7 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral8 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.2
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral5 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.1
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral8 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.2
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral5 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree59 %
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Elected to Clark County Family Court in 2014, Burton previously worked as a family law attorney in private practice for more than 21 years. Burton is up for reelection in 2020.
82 retention responses for this judge
79 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral4 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree63 %
4.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral2 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree55 %
3.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral10 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.1
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
82 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral6 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
78 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral5 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
75 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral5 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral5 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
79 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral5 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.6
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
80 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral3 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree66 %
3.9
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
79 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral10 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4.2
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
80 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral5 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree51 %
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Appointed in 2008 to Clark County Family Court, Teuton previously worked in various roles in the Juvenile Court division since 1988. He is up for reelection in 2020.
58 retention responses for this judge
79 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral2 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.9
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral3 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree47 %
3.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
55 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral3 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree44 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral5 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral5 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
52 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
51 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral6 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
52 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral8 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral2 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.2
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral2 %
Agree39 %
Strongly Agree48 %
3.8
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral9 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree39 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
52 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral7 %
Agree37 %
Strongly Agree43 %
2013 survey
81 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Elected to Clark County Family Court in 2014, Marquis is up for reelection in 2020.
100 retention responses for this judge
78 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
98 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral7 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
98 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral13 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree49 %
3.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
98 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral10 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
98 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral4 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
95 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral10 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral9 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral7 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral14 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree44 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
93 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral12 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
95 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral4 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
94 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral6 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.2
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
93 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral10 %
Agree37 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
92 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral11 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree49 %
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Ritchie was appointed to Clark County Family Court in 1999. He is up for relection in 2020.
98 retention responses for this judge
77 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
96 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral2 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
94 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral5 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
93 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral5 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.1
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
94 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral4 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
92 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral9 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
85 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral5 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
84 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral8 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
80 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral9 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
91 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral8 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
92 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral15 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.2
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
91 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.2
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
92 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral7 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
91 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral11 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree46 %
2013 survey
85 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Henderson Justice Court
First elected to the Henderson Justice Court in 2008, Gibson is up for reelection in 2020.
47 retention responses for this judge
77 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.9
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
45 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral2 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree51 %
3.7
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
44 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral5 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree48 %
3.7
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
44 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral5 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree45 %
3.7
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
43 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral5 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
42 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral7 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
43 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral12 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
42 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral14 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
39 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral10 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree46 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
42 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral10 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.2
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
42 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral7 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.2
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
42 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral5 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.1
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
42 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral14 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
41 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral10 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree54 %
2013 survey
85 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2015, Hardy was retained by voters in 2016. He is up for reelection in 2020.
223 retention responses for this judge
77 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.1
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
217 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.9
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
217 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral8 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.7
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
216 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral11 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree37 %
3.8
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
216 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral10 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree36 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
212 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral7 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
193 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral5 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
197 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral5 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
196 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral7 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
208 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral8 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
216 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
215 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree55 %
3.9
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
213 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral14 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree37 %
4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
214 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral6 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree44 %
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
Appointed to Las Vegas Justice Court in 2006, Saragosa developed and presided over the state's first domestic violence court. She is up for reelection in 2022.
82 retention responses for this judge
77 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
78 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral4 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree53 %
3.9
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
76 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral5 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree52 %
3.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
76 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral8 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree51 %
3.9
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
74 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral8 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
74 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral12 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral9 %
Agree8 %
Strongly Agree65 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree5 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral11 %
Agree7 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral7 %
Agree9 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.1
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
74 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral11 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
74 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral9 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.2
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral9 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.2
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
74 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral8 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree57 %
2013 survey
69 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Nevada Supreme Court
Elected to the state Supreme Court in 2004, Parraguirre previously served as a Las Vegas municipal judge and Clark County district judge. He is up for reelection in 2022.
152 retention responses for this judge
77 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.8
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
135 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral13 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.8
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
136 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral11 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3.7
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
134 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral14 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.8
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
136 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral13 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree30 %
4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
134 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral9 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree37 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
128 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral11 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
129 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral9 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
125 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion16 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral10 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
129 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral13 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree35 %
4.2
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
133 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral6 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree47 %
2013 survey
80 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
North Las Vegas Justice Court
First elected to the North Las Vegas Justice Court in 2008, Lee is up for reelection in 2020.
62 retention responses for this judge
76 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.3
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
61 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral10 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
60 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral2 %
Agree12 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
59 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral3 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.1
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
60 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral2 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
58 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral5 %
Agree12 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral5 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree64 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral10 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral10 %
Agree10 %
Strongly Agree68 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
58 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral3 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4.2
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
58 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral5 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
58 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral5 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4.4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
59 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4.2
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral2 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree67 %
2013 survey
71 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Gentile was elected to Clark County Family Court in 2014, defeating incumbent William Gonzalez. She is up for reelection in 2020.
74 retention responses for this judge
76 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.8
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
74 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral9 %
Agree46 %
Strongly Agree28 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral15 %
Agree37 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.7
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral8 %
Agree45 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.6
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral8 %
Agree41 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.9
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral7 %
Agree39 %
Strongly Agree38 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral4 %
Agree46 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral11 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree35 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
63 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral7 %
Agree44 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral15 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree29 %
4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral6 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.1
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral4 %
Agree45 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.7
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral10 %
Agree40 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3.9
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral13 %
Agree43 %
Strongly Agree32 %
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2012, Earley was retained by voters in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
157 retention responses for this judge
76 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.9
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
154 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral9 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.8
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
153 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral10 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.6
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
151 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral8 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3.6
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
153 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree22 %
Neutral7 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree35 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
148 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral8 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
138 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral7 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
135 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral6 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
137 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral8 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
144 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral9 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4.1
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
151 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.1
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
146 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral11 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree47 %
3.7
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
149 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral12 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.9
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
151 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral10 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree37 %
2013 survey
71 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
First elected to the Clark County District Court in 2008, Bell ran unopposed in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
206 retention responses for this judge
76 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
206 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral5 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree46 %
3.8
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
202 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral6 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.7
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
201 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral9 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.8
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
202 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral9 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree40 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
200 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral7 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
191 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral8 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
191 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
188 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral9 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree52 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
197 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral6 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4.1
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
198 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral8 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.1
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
198 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral8 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
195 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral8 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
197 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral4 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree44 %
2013 survey
81 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Appointed in 2009 to Clark County Family Court, Hoskins previously worked as an attorney in private practice. He has been the presiding judge over Family Court since 2014 and is up for re-election in 2020.
92 retention responses for this judge
75 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.1
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral4 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree50 %
3.8
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
88 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral10 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.8
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral11 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.9
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
88 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral9 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.9
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
88 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral7 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral7 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree49 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
84 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral10 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
77 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral11 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral11 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree40 %
4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
87 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral11 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.1
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral8 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral10 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral8 %
Agree37 %
Strongly Agree44 %
2013 survey
90 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
First elected to Las Vegas Justice Court in 2018, Graham is up for reelection in 2024.
73 retention responses for this judge
75 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
68 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral3 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral3 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral0 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree60 %
3.9
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral3 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral2 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree62 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral3 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree69 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral4 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree66 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral4 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree67 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral3 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.2
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral6 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.2
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral5 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.2
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral6 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.2
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral6 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree61 %
Minimize
Nevada Supreme Court
Elected to the state Supreme Court in 2008, Pickering will serve as chief justice in 2020, when she will face reelection.
218 retention responses for this judge
75 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
195 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral6 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree60 %
4.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
199 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral8 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree54 %
3.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
199 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral6 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
197 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral9 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
192 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral8 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
181 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral9 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
185 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral10 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
177 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion15 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral10 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
191 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral8 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.2
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
193 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral6 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree54 %
2013 survey
69 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
A Las Vegas justice of the peace since 2000, Zimmerman is up for reelection in 2024.
74 retention responses for this judge
74 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral4 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree49 %
3.8
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral10 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree48 %
3.7
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral11 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree46 %
3.9
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral7 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral3 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
68 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral9 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral7 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral9 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral9 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree57 %
3.9
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral7 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.1
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral6 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.2
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
68 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral3 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral6 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree58 %
2013 survey
76 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2004, Cory was retained by voters and last reelected in 2014. He is up for reelection in 2020.
187 retention responses for this judge
74 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
183 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral11 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.9
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
183 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral11 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.7
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
185 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral9 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.8
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
182 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral11 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
183 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral11 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
168 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
172 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral8 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
166 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral9 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
179 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
181 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral6 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.2
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
180 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral13 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree51 %
3.9
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
178 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral15 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree37 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
179 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral12 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree47 %
2013 survey
76 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
Andress-Tobiasson was appointed to Las Vegas Justice Court in 2009. She previously worked as a deputy in the Clark County district attorney's office. She is up for reelection in 2024.
106 retention responses for this judge
74 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
103 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral7 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.8
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
103 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral8 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.7
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
103 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral12 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.7
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
102 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral12 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.7
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
100 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral7 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
99 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral7 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
99 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral13 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
92 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral10 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree52 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
100 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.8
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
99 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral8 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
100 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral10 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.7
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
99 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral13 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.7
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
98 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral11 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree39 %
2013 survey
85 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Before his 2008 election to Clark County Family Court, Henderson worked as an attorney in private practice for 20 years, specializing in family law and civil litigation. He is up for reelection in 2020.
86 retention responses for this judge
73 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.7
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral15 %
Agree40 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
85 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral13 %
Agree40 %
Strongly Agree24 %
3.5
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
85 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral15 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree25 %
3.5
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
84 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral9 %
Agree40 %
Strongly Agree25 %
4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
82 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral12 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree39 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral2 %
Agree39 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
74 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral5 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree33 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion17 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree37 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
79 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral15 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree28 %
4.1
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral8 %
Agree37 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.9
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
82 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral12 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.6
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral12 %
Agree41 %
Strongly Agree25 %
3.8
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral12 %
Agree42 %
Strongly Agree29 %
2013 survey
71 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2004, Gonzalez was retained by voters and last reelected in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
271 retention responses for this judge
73 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
265 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral5 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree60 %
3.9
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
262 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral7 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree48 %
3.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
263 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral11 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
264 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral11 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
265 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral14 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
249 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral10 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
252 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral7 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
242 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral10 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree53 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
259 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral10 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.7
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
263 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral10 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.2
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
263 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral9 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
259 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral10 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree53 %
3.9
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
261 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral13 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree47 %
2013 survey
81 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Delaney was first elected to the Clark County District Court in 2008 and was reelected in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
233 retention responses for this judge
73 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.1
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
229 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral10 %
Agree37 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.9
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
229 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral10 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.6
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
228 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral11 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.8
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
228 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral10 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.2
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
225 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral9 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
216 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral7 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
216 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral7 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
208 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral8 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
225 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral8 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
222 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
225 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral11 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree55 %
3.4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
225 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral13 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree34 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
222 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral12 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree47 %
2013 survey
65 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2007, Villani was retained by voters in 2014. He is up for reelection in 2020.
189 retention responses for this judge
71 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
177 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral6 %
Agree39 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.7
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
175 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral11 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.5
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
175 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral8 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree33 %
3.6
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
175 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral12 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.9
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
177 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral11 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral10 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
163 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral8 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
157 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral11 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree49 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
172 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral8 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4.1
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
174 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral10 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.1
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
174 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral8 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
171 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral11 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
171 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral8 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree42 %
2013 survey
77 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Municipal Court
A Las Vegas municipal judge since1997, Kerns was last reelected in 2017. During his more than two decades on the bench, he created a youth offender court. He is up for reelection in 2023.
64 retention responses for this judge
70 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral2 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree56 %
3.8
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree19 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral6 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree49 %
3.8
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
61 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral6 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree50 %
3.9
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
59 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral5 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree52 %
3.9
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
61 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
60 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral3 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
60 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral5 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree61 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral5 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree60 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
60 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral2 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree52 %
3.7
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral6 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral6 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.1
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
59 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral7 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
60 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral8 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree56 %
2013 survey
75 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
North Las Vegas Justice Court
A North Las Vegas justice of the peace since 2000, Tyrrell is up for reelection in 2024.
54 retention responses for this judge
70 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.8
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral4 %
Agree41 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.8
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
54 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral6 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.6
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral9 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.7
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral15 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree38 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
50 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral10 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
49 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral10 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
47 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral8 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
48 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral12 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
48 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral6 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.2
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
48 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral4 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree55 %
4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
50 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral10 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree46 %
3.8
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
50 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral6 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4.1
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
50 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral6 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree44 %
2013 survey
76 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
Sullivan was elected to Las Vegas Justice Court in 2009. She previously worked for 17 years as an attorney in private practice. Sullivan is up for reelection in 2020.
86 retention responses for this judge
69 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.9
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
85 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral7 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree51 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral7 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree48 %
3.4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree24 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral6 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.6
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral11 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.8
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
80 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral11 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
79 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral12 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree59 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
78 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral10 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree56 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral9 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree53 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree20 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral10 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree54 %
3.7
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral9 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral12 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree54 %
3.9
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral11 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree52 %
3.8
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral7 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree47 %
2013 survey
75 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Sturman was elected to the Clark County District Court in 2010 and ran unopposed in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
192 retention responses for this judge
68 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.8
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
186 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral10 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
185 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree22 %
Neutral9 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.5
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
185 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree25 %
Neutral8 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree33 %
3.6
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
185 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral14 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree31 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
183 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral10 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
166 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral9 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
169 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral10 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral10 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
178 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral8 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree39 %
4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
183 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral10 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree41 %
4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
182 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.7
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
185 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral16 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.8
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
184 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral11 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree31 %
2013 survey
71 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
Elected in 2004 to Las Vegas Justice Court, Bonaventure previously worked as an attorney in private practice and as a deputy in the Clark County district attorney's office. He is up for reelection in 2022.
72 retention responses for this judge
68 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.9
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral8 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree47 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral6 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.6
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral11 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.5
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree22 %
Neutral8 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.8
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral10 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral10 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
68 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral7 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral10 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree51 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral12 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree47 %
3.6
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
68 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral10 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.8
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral12 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.1
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral6 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree49 %
3.9
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral7 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree49 %
2013 survey
71 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Johnson was first elected to the Clark County District Court in 2006 and was reelected in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
244 retention responses for this judge
68 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.9
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
240 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral7 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree47 %
3.7
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
239 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral7 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.6
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
238 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral6 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.7
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
239 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral8 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.8
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
237 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral9 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
216 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral11 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
216 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral13 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
208 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral11 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree45 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
231 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral11 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.7
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
237 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral7 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
235 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral11 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree45 %
3.9
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
231 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral13 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.8
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
234 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral10 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree41 %
2013 survey
71 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Crockett was elected to the Clark County District Court in 2014 after working for more than three decades in civil litigation. He is up for reelection in 2020.
226 retention responses for this judge
67 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
222 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral5 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree52 %
3.7
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
221 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral9 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.6
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
221 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral10 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.7
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
221 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral7 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.9
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
219 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
198 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral9 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
198 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral7 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
187 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion16 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral10 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree50 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
210 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral10 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.8
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
221 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral12 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.1
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
220 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral9 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree49 %
3.6
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
218 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral15 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.9
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
218 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral12 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree39 %
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Bare was elected to the Clark County District Court in 2010 and was reelected in 2014. He is up for reelection in 2020.
261 retention responses for this judge
67 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
256 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral9 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree46 %
3.7
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
255 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral9 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
253 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral11 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.6
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
255 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral12 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree36 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
250 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
227 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral12 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
228 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral8 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree51 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
223 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral12 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree51 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
246 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral11 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree44 %
4.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
252 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral8 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4.2
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
252 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree2 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral13 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree51 %
3.8
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
249 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral17 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree41 %
4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
251 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral11 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree43 %
2013 survey
80 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Nevada Supreme Court
Elected to the state Supreme Court in 2004, Hardesty previously led the effort to create a state Court of Appeals. He is up for reelection in 2022.
193 retention responses for this judge
66 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.1
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
178 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral8 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree47 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
177 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral13 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree33 %
3.5
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
176 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral12 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree29 %
3.7
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
177 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral18 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.8
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
177 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral15 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree39 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
163 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral10 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
166 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral13 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
158 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral11 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
176 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral13 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.9
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
172 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral18 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree40 %
2013 survey
73 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Nevada Supreme Court
Elected to the state Supreme Court in 2018, Silver previously served as a judge on the Nevada Court of Appeals. She is up for reelection in 2024.
226 retention responses for this judge
65 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.9
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
206 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral11 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
208 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral9 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.6
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
205 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral6 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.6
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
207 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral11 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree37 %
3.7
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
203 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral8 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree44 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
194 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral9 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
194 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral10 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
186 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral11 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree49 %
3.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
199 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral6 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.6
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
201 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral9 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree40 %
2013 survey
65 %
Retention Recommendation
( then a Clark County district judge )
Minimize
Clark County District Court
First elected in 2004 to Clark County Family Court, Miley was elected to District Court in 2008 and again in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
198 retention responses for this judge
65 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.6
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
191 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral8 %
Agree41 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.5
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
190 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral8 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
190 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral6 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree28 %
3.5
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
191 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral9 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.8
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
188 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral8 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree38 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
177 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral10 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
178 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral11 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
170 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral10 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
182 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral10 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree37 %
4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
188 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral11 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.8
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
187 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral12 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree37 %
3.8
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
187 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral14 %
Agree39 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.7
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
185 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral13 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree32 %
2013 survey
62 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Municipal Court
First elected to the Las Vegas Municipal Court in 2011, Roger was reelected in 2017. She is up for reelection in 2023.
46 retention responses for this judge
65 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.7
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
48 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral12 %
Agree12 %
Strongly Agree49 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
47 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral6 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree51 %
3.6
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
46 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree20 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral7 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree48 %
3.7
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
47 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral9 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree51 %
3.8
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
46 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree20 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral11 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree54 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
45 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral15 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree57 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
44 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral16 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree58 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
43 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral17 %
Agree9 %
Strongly Agree59 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
45 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree20 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree9 %
Strongly Agree53 %
3.9
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
46 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral13 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree57 %
3.9
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
45 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral4 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree53 %
4.1
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
45 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral9 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree60 %
3.9
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
46 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral7 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree54 %
2013 survey
76 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2015, Johnson previously worked as a federal prosecutor. He is up for reelection in 2020.
166 retention responses for this judge
64 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.8
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
163 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral8 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
162 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral13 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3.4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral13 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.5
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
162 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral14 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.9
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
158 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral7 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree39 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
149 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral10 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
151 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral9 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree40 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
143 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral14 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
157 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral10 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.7
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral12 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.9
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral12 %
Agree39 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
158 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral16 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree24 %
3.7
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
158 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral14 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree32 %
Minimize
Henderson Municipal Court
First elected to the Henderson Municipal Court in 2007, Stevens was last reelected in 2019. He is up for reelection in 2026.
38 retention responses for this judge
63 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
39 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral13 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree49 %
3.7
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral11 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree47 %
3.7
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral13 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree47 %
3.7
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral24 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree45 %
3.6
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral14 %
Agree8 %
Strongly Agree46 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
35 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral22 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree46 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
36 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral16 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
34 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral24 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral11 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.5
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral18 %
Agree8 %
Strongly Agree42 %
4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral8 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.1
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral8 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree50 %
4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
38 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral13 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree50 %
2013 survey
76 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2002, Leavitt was retained by voters and last reelected in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
199 retention responses for this judge
63 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.6
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
193 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral10 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.5
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
192 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral6 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3.3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
191 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral7 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3.4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
191 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral10 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3.6
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
190 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral11 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
180 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral14 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
179 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral11 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree41 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
172 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral15 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
187 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral12 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.6
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
188 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral11 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.6
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
189 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral13 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.8
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
192 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral15 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.6
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
188 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral12 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree33 %
2013 survey
46 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2012, Escobar was retained by voters and reelected in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
164 retention responses for this judge
62 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.6
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
162 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral8 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree33 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral11 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
160 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral10 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
160 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral12 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree28 %
4.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
160 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral16 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
145 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral12 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree49 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
146 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral12 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
143 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree0 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral12 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree47 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
151 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral10 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
160 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree1 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral8 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral12 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.5
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral14 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree28 %
3.9
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
159 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral10 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree36 %
2013 survey
71 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Court of Appeals
Bulla was appointed to the Court of Appeals on Feb. 13 to replace Abbi Silver, who was elected to the state Supreme Court. Bulla is up for reelection in 2020.
130 retention responses for this judge
62 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4.1
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
124 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral11 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
125 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral11 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.5
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
125 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral8 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.6
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
125 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral6 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.8
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
124 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral15 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
110 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral10 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
113 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral12 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree52 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
107 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion15 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral10 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree52 %
3.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
120 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree22 %
Neutral9 %
Agree12 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.5
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
122 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral10 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree43 %
Minimize
Court of Appeals
Tao was appointed to the inaugural Court of Appeals in 2014 after serving as a Clark County district judge. He is up for reelection in 2022.
177 retention responses for this judge
62 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.9
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
163 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral11 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree47 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
168 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral9 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree45 %
3.5
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
166 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral8 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.6
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
168 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral9 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree45 %
3.7
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
167 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral9 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree45 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
154 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral13 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
152 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral12 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree43 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
151 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral15 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
164 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral14 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.8
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
165 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral12 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree49 %
2013 survey
86 %
Retention Recommendation
( then a Clark County district judge )
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Kishner was elected to the Clark County District Court in 2010 and ran unopposed in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
212 retention responses for this judge
61 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
207 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral11 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
206 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral12 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.4
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
207 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral7 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree33 %
3.5
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
208 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral14 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.9
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
204 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral13 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree44 %
4.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
184 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral10 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree48 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
184 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral11 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree46 %
4.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
178 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion16 %
Strongly Disagree3 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral10 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree45 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
198 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral9 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
210 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral11 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree33 %
4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
209 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral11 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree45 %
3.5
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
207 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral14 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.6
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
209 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral13 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree35 %
2013 survey
69 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Holthus was elected to the bench in 2018 after working for more than two decades as a Clark County prosecutor. She is up for reelection in 2020.
111 retention responses for this judge
59 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.3
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
105 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree19 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral8 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3.4
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
103 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral5 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree33 %
3.3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
104 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral8 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3.3
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
103 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree19 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral8 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3.6
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
103 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral13 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
100 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral8 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
100 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral9 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree44 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
96 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral9 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree45 %
3.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
103 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral5 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.8
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
101 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.6
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
103 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral6 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree37 %
3.7
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
102 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral11 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.6
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
103 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral10 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree38 %
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Kephart was elected to the Clark County District Court in 2014 after serving as a Las Vegas justice of the peace. He is up for reelection in 2020.
197 retention responses for this judge
55 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.5
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
195 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral12 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree28 %
3.3
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
194 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral15 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.1
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
194 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree19 %
Disagree25 %
Neutral12 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.2
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
192 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral18 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
191 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral13 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
179 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral14 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree37 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
181 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral17 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree37 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
170 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral16 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
187 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral11 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3.4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
194 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral15 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree29 %
3.7
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
193 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral17 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.7
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
188 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral18 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3.5
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
192 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral16 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree30 %
2013 survey
69 %
Retention Recommendation
( then a Las Vegas justice of the peace )
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
Elected in 2010 to Las Vegas Justice Court, Baucum is up for reelection in 2020.
72 retention responses for this judge
54 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.6
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral7 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.3
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
69 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree29 %
Neutral7 %
Agree10 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
68 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree28 %
Neutral12 %
Agree7 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.4
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral18 %
Agree10 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.5
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
66 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree23 %
Neutral11 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral9 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree41 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral9 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree44 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree26 %
Neutral8 %
Agree6 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.7
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral11 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree46 %
3.7
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral14 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree46 %
3.9
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
65 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral3 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree58 %
3.8
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral8 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree52 %
2013 survey
68 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Elected to the Clark County District Court in 2014, Scotti is up for reelection in 2020.
230 retention responses for this judge
52 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.5
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
221 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral8 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3.3
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
222 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral9 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
220 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree23 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral9 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.2
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
219 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree22 %
Neutral8 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.6
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
214 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral12 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree37 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
192 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral12 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree39 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
194 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral11 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree40 %
4.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
188 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion15 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral14 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
212 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral9 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree37 %
3.7
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
214 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral9 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.8
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
214 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral13 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.6
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
211 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral16 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.3
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
210 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral14 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree27 %
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
First elected to Clark County Family Court in 2010, Ochoa previously practiced family law for 31 years in Las Vegas and Reno. He is up for reelection in 2020.
92 retention responses for this judge
52 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
2.9
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
88 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree32 %
Neutral17 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree17 %
3
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree29 %
Neutral17 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree15 %
3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree27 %
Neutral16 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree15 %
3.1
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
87 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral19 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree16 %
3.5
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
82 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral18 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
75 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral17 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
79 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral12 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral19 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral13 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree25 %
3.8
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
84 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral11 %
Agree41 %
Strongly Agree29 %
3.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
82 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral18 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree21 %
3.4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral25 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree18 %
3.6
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
82 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral15 %
Agree42 %
Strongly Agree21 %
2013 survey
64 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
Bennett-Haron in 2002 became the first black female judge appointed to Las Vegas Justice Court. She previously served as general counsel for the Las Vegas Housing Authority. She is up for reelection in 2022.
122 retention responses for this judge
51 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
117 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree22 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral8 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
115 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree29 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral4 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.1
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
117 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree31 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral3 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.2
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
115 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree27 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral6 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree38 %
3.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
117 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree34 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral5 %
Agree10 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
116 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree39 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral3 %
Agree10 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
116 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral16 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree43 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
109 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree1 %
Neutral14 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
114 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree32 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral3 %
Agree8 %
Strongly Agree41 %
2.9
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
118 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree38 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral6 %
Agree9 %
Strongly Agree35 %
3.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
118 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree20 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral7 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree42 %
3.4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
116 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral9 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.4
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
118 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree26 %
Disagree9 %
Neutral5 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree39 %
2013 survey
64 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
Elected in 2012 to Las Vegas Justice Court, Cruz previously owned her own law firm. She is up for reelection in 2024.
66 retention responses for this judge
48 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.5
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral6 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree33 %
3.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree19 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral13 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.1
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
61 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree28 %
Neutral8 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree28 %
3.1
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
62 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree24 %
Neutral11 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
60 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral12 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
56 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral14 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral12 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree37 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
53 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion10 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral8 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree37 %
3.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree28 %
Neutral12 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree33 %
3.3
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
59 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree19 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral15 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
59 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral7 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3.6
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
58 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral12 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.6
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
57 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral9 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree40 %
2013 survey
55 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Harter was elected to Clark County Family Court in 2008 and was reelected in 2014. He was defeated by Lidia Stiglich last year for a seat on the state Supreme Court. Harter is up for reelection in 2020.
94 retention responses for this judge
48 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.5
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
95 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral7 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
94 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree19 %
Disagree26 %
Neutral10 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree24 %
3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
92 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree20 %
Disagree23 %
Neutral14 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree23 %
3.3
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
94 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral12 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree23 %
3.3
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
93 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral10 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
86 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral23 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
88 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral14 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree22 %
3.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
79 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral18 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree23 %
3.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
92 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree20 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral13 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree22 %
3.2
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
93 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral16 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree22 %
3.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
93 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral13 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree28 %
3.6
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
92 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral15 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3.5
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
92 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral18 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree27 %
2013 survey
71 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Brown served as a judge in Clark County Family Court between 2000 and 2008. She returned to Family Court in 2014 and is up for reelection in 2020.
73 retention responses for this judge
47 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.1
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
75 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree27 %
Neutral17 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree17 %
3.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree30 %
Neutral11 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree21 %
3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
70 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree26 %
Neutral13 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree19 %
3.1
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
73 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree22 %
Neutral16 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree16 %
3.6
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral21 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree30 %
3.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
67 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion8 %
Strongly Disagree7 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral15 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
70 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral14 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree25 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
63 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral18 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree29 %
3.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral18 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree23 %
3.6
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral10 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree23 %
Neutral11 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
71 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree25 %
Neutral10 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree15 %
3.2
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
72 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral16 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree23 %
Minimize
Las Vegas Justice Court
Kern was elected to Las Vegas Justice Court in 2016. She is up for reelection in 2022.
47 retention responses for this judge
47 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
45 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree23 %
Disagree23 %
Neutral6 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree27 %
2.8
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
42 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree28 %
Disagree22 %
Neutral2 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree22 %
2.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
43 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree26 %
Disagree24 %
Neutral4 %
Agree15 %
Strongly Agree24 %
2.7
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
41 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree29 %
Disagree24 %
Neutral4 %
Agree13 %
Strongly Agree20 %
3.6
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
41 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral18 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
39 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral20 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
39 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral16 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
37 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion14 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree0 %
Neutral21 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree40 %
3.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
41 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral14 %
Agree9 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.6
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
42 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral11 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree39 %
3.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
41 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral9 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
41 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree27 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral16 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.5
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
40 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral9 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree30 %
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Israel was elected to the Clark County District Court in 2010 and was reelected in 2014. He is up for reelection in 2020.
245 retention responses for this judge
46 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.1
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
242 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral15 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree15 %
2.9
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
239 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree25 %
Neutral12 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree17 %
2.8
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
239 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree23 %
Disagree23 %
Neutral12 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree14 %
2.9
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
239 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree19 %
Disagree23 %
Neutral17 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree14 %
3.4
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
234 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral18 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree26 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
211 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree5 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral13 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree37 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
216 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree6 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral15 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree37 %
4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
208 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree4 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral15 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree36 %
3.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
226 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral18 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.1
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
237 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral16 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree20 %
3.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
236 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral20 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree16 %
3.4
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
233 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree8 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral22 %
Agree37 %
Strongly Agree16 %
3.3
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
236 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral21 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree18 %
2013 survey
61 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County District Court
Appointed to the Clark County District Court in 2011, Ellsworth was retained by voters in 2014. She is up for reelection in 2020.
171 retention responses for this judge
44 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.7
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
164 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral9 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree41 %
3
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
164 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree22 %
Disagree28 %
Neutral6 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
162 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree25 %
Disagree22 %
Neutral9 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.1
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral8 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree28 %
3.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
160 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree23 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral9 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree28 %
3.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
153 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral14 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
151 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree8 %
Neutral18 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree34 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
141 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral18 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree28 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral9 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree28 %
2.8
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
162 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree30 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral10 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree22 %
3.6
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral18 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
159 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree22 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral18 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree20 %
3.3
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
161 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral14 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree30 %
2013 survey
51 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Elected to Clark County Family Court in 2006, Potter previously worked as an attorney in private practice for 10 years. The Henderson native is up for reelection in 2020.
91 retention responses for this judge
44 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.5
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree12 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral9 %
Agree48 %
Strongly Agree20 %
3.2
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral18 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree20 %
3.1
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
89 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral18 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree18 %
3.2
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
87 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral20 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree18 %
3.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
87 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree20 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral9 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree18 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral15 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree29 %
3.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
82 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral15 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
76 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion12 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral19 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree27 %
3.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
84 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion5 %
Strongly Disagree19 %
Disagree23 %
Neutral10 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree24 %
2.4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
88 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree38 %
Disagree19 %
Neutral18 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree9 %
3.4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
87 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral14 %
Agree41 %
Strongly Agree19 %
3.7
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
85 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral15 %
Agree43 %
Strongly Agree25 %
2.9
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
85 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral17 %
Agree31 %
Strongly Agree10 %
2013 survey
59 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Moss worked as an attorney in solo private practice between 1997 and 2000, when she was elected to Clark County Family Court. She is up for reelection in 2020.
84 retention responses for this judge
42 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
2.9
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
85 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree24 %
Neutral13 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree17 %
3
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree24 %
Neutral12 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree24 %
2.8
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
84 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree24 %
Disagree24 %
Neutral17 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree18 %
2.8
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
85 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree22 %
Disagree25 %
Neutral16 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree18 %
3.5
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral13 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree29 %
3.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree6 %
Neutral10 %
Agree36 %
Strongly Agree33 %
3.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral13 %
Agree27 %
Strongly Agree33 %
3.8
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
75 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion9 %
Strongly Disagree10 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral15 %
Agree35 %
Strongly Agree29 %
3.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
82 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree22 %
Disagree16 %
Neutral14 %
Agree23 %
Strongly Agree24 %
3.7
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
82 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral7 %
Agree40 %
Strongly Agree31 %
3.5
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree13 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral15 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree27 %
2.5
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
83 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree40 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral11 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree16 %
3.2
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral17 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree22 %
2013 survey
44 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
Elected to Clark County Family Court in 2014, Hughes previously worked in private practice. She is up for reelection in 2020.
84 retention responses for this judge
42 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.4
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree20 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral10 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.1
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree22 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral11 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree26 %
2.9
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree25 %
Disagree22 %
Neutral12 %
Agree16 %
Strongly Agree25 %
3.1
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral12 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree23 %
3.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
80 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree23 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral15 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.5
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
70 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral19 %
Agree24 %
Strongly Agree26 %
3.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
74 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion6 %
Strongly Disagree22 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral10 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree28 %
3.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
64 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion17 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree5 %
Neutral19 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree22 %
3.1
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
76 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion3 %
Strongly Disagree23 %
Disagree17 %
Neutral13 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree23 %
2.9
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
79 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree25 %
Disagree20 %
Neutral14 %
Agree19 %
Strongly Agree22 %
3.4
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
79 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral11 %
Agree33 %
Strongly Agree28 %
3.3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
78 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree15 %
Disagree12 %
Neutral22 %
Agree28 %
Strongly Agree23 %
3.2
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
78 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree16 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral18 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree19 %
Minimize
North Las Vegas Municipal Court
First elected to the North Las Vegas Municipal Court in 2005, Hoeffgen is up for reelection in 2022.
29 retention responses for this judge
41 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3.2
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
29 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree28 %
Disagree3 %
Neutral7 %
Agree45 %
Strongly Agree17 %
2.7
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
28 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree32 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral11 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree14 %
2.5
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
28 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree36 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral11 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree14 %
2.9
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
28 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree32 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral21 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree21 %
3.1
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
28 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree32 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral14 %
Agree14 %
Strongly Agree32 %
3.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
27 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree25 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral14 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree25 %
3.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
27 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree25 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral14 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree25 %
3.3
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
26 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion7 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral18 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree29 %
2.9
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
28 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree25 %
Disagree25 %
Neutral11 %
Agree18 %
Strongly Agree21 %
2.9
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
28 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree29 %
Disagree18 %
Neutral14 %
Agree11 %
Strongly Agree29 %
3.2
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
28 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree25 %
Disagree7 %
Neutral14 %
Agree29 %
Strongly Agree25 %
3.3
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
28 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree4 %
Neutral32 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree25 %
3.3
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
28 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion0 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree11 %
Neutral18 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree29 %
2013 survey
66 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
Clark County Family Court
First elected to Clark County Family Court in 2004, Pomrenze previously worked as an attorney in private practice. She is up for reelection in 2020.
97 retention responses for this judge
28 %
Retention
Recommendation
2019 Survey Questions Click on signs to see full results
Show all results
3
The judge was familiar with the case record and documents.
95 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree21 %
Neutral7 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree16 %
2.6
It was evident that the judge weighed all evidence and arguments fairly before rendering a decision.
94 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree23 %
Disagree34 %
Neutral12 %
Agree20 %
Strongly Agree11 %
2.8
The judge accurately applied the law, the rules of procedure, and/or the rules of evidence.
94 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree21 %
Disagree24 %
Neutral19 %
Agree22 %
Strongly Agree13 %
2.9
The judge’s explanation of the basis for their decision was clear.
93 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree19 %
Disagree25 %
Neutral16 %
Agree25 %
Strongly Agree13 %
3
The judge's behavior was free from the appearance of impropriety.
90 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion4 %
Strongly Disagree17 %
Disagree23 %
Neutral17 %
Agree21 %
Strongly Agree17 %
3.4
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the race or ethnicity of the parties involved.
80 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion13 %
Strongly Disagree11 %
Disagree10 %
Neutral17 %
Agree32 %
Strongly Agree17 %
3.2
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the gender of the parties involved.
81 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion11 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree14 %
Neutral13 %
Agree30 %
Strongly Agree18 %
3.6
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the religion of the parties involved.
76 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion17 %
Strongly Disagree9 %
Disagree2 %
Neutral20 %
Agree34 %
Strongly Agree18 %
2.7
The judge's conduct in the matter was free from bias on the basis of the particular parties or attorneys involved.
91 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree25 %
Disagree25 %
Neutral17 %
Agree17 %
Strongly Agree14 %
2.4
The judge consistently demonstrated courtesy and respect.
93 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree28 %
Disagree37 %
Neutral11 %
Agree12 %
Strongly Agree12 %
3.3
The judge seemed attentive to the matter at hand.
92 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree13 %
Neutral20 %
Agree38 %
Strongly Agree14 %
3.2
The judge was successful at keeping court business moving appropriately.
91 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion2 %
Strongly Disagree14 %
Disagree15 %
Neutral17 %
Agree41 %
Strongly Agree11 %
2.8
The judge’s behavior was consistent.
92 responses
Breakdown of Question Summary Score
No Opinion1 %
Strongly Disagree18 %
Disagree27 %
Neutral18 %
Agree26 %
Strongly Agree10 %
2013 survey
47 %
Retention Recommendation
Minimize
