44°F
weather icon Clear

‘Card check’ bill

During the congressional campaigns of 2006, Democratic candidates hammered at a Republican "culture of corruption" personified by disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and the everything-for-sale politics of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. Democrats succeeded in convincing Americans that they would be less beholden to special interests if entrusted with control of Congress.

So what are Americans to make of Democrats' persistent efforts to reward their union constituents with legislation the party itself doesn't believe in?

On Tuesday, Senate Republicans succeeded in blocking a vote on the so-called "Employee Free Choice Act," which would force employers to recognize a union on a card count, thereby giving labor groups nearly unlimited license to intimidate workers until a majority sign cards agreeing to support organization. Although the bill lacks support in the upper house and faces a certain veto from President Bush if it were ever passed, Democrats were quick to criticize Republicans for siding with "big business" over "working families."

In fact, that mischaracterizes the Employee Free Choice Act. It would all but do away with the secret ballot in unionization efforts, allowing labor to send its legions door to door, reminding prospective members in person -- repeatedly -- that it's in their best interests to sign the card. Never mind that secret ballots strike a balance between employer and employee concerns of fairness, and that unions can still win secret ballots handily -- witness the May vote by Wynn Las Vegas dealers to join the Transportation Workers of America.

Democrats' opposition to secret ballots in union elections is curious considering the party used just such a process to select its leaders at the beginning of this year's session.

And it's even more puzzling based on their January introduction of a bill that outlined U.S. government support for building democracies abroad through "the right to free, fair, and open elections, secret balloting, and universal suffrage."

Democrats are guilty here of the same kind of water-carrying they accused Republicans of doing in years past. Rather than concern themselves with how their votes might affect common citizens prospering in non-union environments, Democratic senators and representatives are focused exclusively on rewarding organized labor and locking up union support for next year's election.

Senate Republicans did American workers a favor by keeping this legislation from a floor vote.

THE LATEST
LETTERS: Democrats get what they deserved

The future looks bright again for the United States given that some competent people will be taking over for this present group of non-achievers.

VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: Harris was always doomed

For months it was widely reported, albeit grudgingly, that there were large defections in Hispanic and African American voters from Harris.

COMMENTARY: Trump’s victory, through the lens of cable news

I figured it would be instructive to watch how the networks that have exhibited a visceral hatred for Donald Trump since he came on the political scene described the trajectory of the evening.

RICH LOWRY: Trump shows demography isn’t destiny

Trump famously dethroned the Republican establishment in 2016, and now has crushed its theory of how to forge a GOP future in an increasingly diverse country.

EDITORIAL: Yes, it was the economy, stupid

Mr. Trump’s victory, coupled with GOP control of the Senate and likely the House, means the 2017 tax bill — due to expire next year — will certainly be renewed.

LETTER: Do our politicians care what we think?

Don’t expect much, if anything, from our elected officials. Then you won’t be let down when their performance is less than stellar.