45°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Let’s wait for the facts on SpeedVegas tragedy

I think that Sunday’s Review-Journal article on SpeedVegas was a bit of a hit piece (“Experts ID numerous factors in fatal crash”). The government investigation has not been completed yet “experts” quoted in the article have already rendered opined answers.

According to the article, one of the industry experts is a direct competitor who has been in litigation with SpeedVegas twice. I am sure he does not have a dog in the hunt.

The other expert, a freelance professional race car driver and instructor, appeared to have never set foot on the SpeedVegas property or drove the course. He studied the layout and reviewed the SpeedVegas operations. Just how did he do that? Did he actually go out there and talk to the SpeedVegas folks and watch their operation? Watching a few customer videos is not really going to tell you much.

Last point: More government regulation is not the answer.

THE LATEST
LETTER: Let’s give Trump a chance

Let’s remember that we’re all Americans, and we want our country to have good leadership.

LETTER: Donald Trump wins the election

Could it be that the people who kept telling us that they were the truth-tellers were just snake-oil sellers?

LETTER: The justice system and Henry Ruggs

It is with great sadness that I read Henry Ruggs is almost a free man and housed in a facility for nonviolent offenders.

LETTER: Eliminate the Department of Education

I can’t say that I have read the entirety of Project 2025. I can definitely say that I am 100 percent in favor of abolishing the Department of Education.

LETTER: Order in the classroom

Even with a new interim superintendent and $281 million just for textbooks and supplies, Clark County students will not be learning as they could and should due to unruly classroom behavior.

LETTER: Instead of abortion, how about birth control?

It is mind-boggling that the most important issue some voters are concerned about is the ability of a mother to abort her unborn child.

LETTER: Why did Question 3 include ranked-choice?

I voted “yes” on Question 3, not for ranked-choice voting, but for a voice in the primary elections as an independent voter.