Open space

Like every other part of the state budget, parks took a hit. The spending plan passed by the Legislature and signed into law by Gov. Brian Sandoval last month reduces general fund support for state parks to $3.3 million in 2013, down from $8.5 million in 2008.

But state park officials were also given the ability to increase revenues themselves. Senate Bill 442 expands the goods and services state parks are allowed to sell, from concessions to camping spaces. All money raised is to be diverted to an enterprise fund that supports park operations.

It is basically a sign of the times," said Valley of Fire State Park Superintendent Jim Hammons. "You have to think this way if you want to survive."

During better economic times, governments were under no pressure to rethink and reform their missions. Today, government entities finally have a sense of the stress that motivates the private sector each and every day.

While there might be a legitimate concern in isolated instances about allowing public-sector entities to compete with private sector businesses, this is -- overall -- a good thing. And it inevitably will lead to some good ideas, whether it's upgraded campgrounds with cabins, yurts and general stores, the creation of fee-generating special events or partnerships and sponsorships with companies.

Some, of course, don't like the idea, apparently preferring to simply shutter parks rather than push for innovation.

"I don't know why we try so hard to come up with gimmicks instead of just funding the state parks system," said Sen. Sheila Leslie, D-Reno.

Is it that hard to understand? Rising personnel costs and a recession-driven slump in revenues have squeezed parks and other nonessential state agencies. We need more "gimmicks" to cut taxpayer costs and keep our parks open, not fewer.