71°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Democrats worried riots will hurt them at the polls

Updated September 1, 2020 - 9:14 pm

When Democrats, including those who run our biggest cities, thought that the riots would hurt Republicans, they connived and deceived their way into an awkward corner by allowing them to continue, describing them as mostly peaceful protests and even bailing many of the arrestees out of jail. Now, after months of encouraging them — after months of assaults, deaths and destruction; now that the American people have recognized reality and opinion polls and betting odds have moved to the benefit of Republicans — Democrats are starting to backtrack and criticize the riots.

I think it is too late because, despite media cover and assistance, it is now already obvious that Democrats care more about the power that comes with electoral victory than they do about the very lives and businesses of so many innocent Americans.

Oh, what a tangled web …

THE LATEST
LETTER: Those dastardly mosquitoes

In the past month, I have shed my human identity and become a walking itch.

LETTER: The carbon-spewing Biden family

Climate change is an existential threat to mankind, animals and plants. Why doesn’t the Biden family lead the way?

LETTER: The Trump show trial

Remember, Martin Luther King, Mahatma Ghandi and Sir Thomas More — all innocent men — were also declared to be guilty.

LETTER: No conspiracy involving Hunter’s laptop

The R-J should acknowledge that Mr. Trump’s lies, frauds, defamations, criminal indictments and convictions are exponentially worse than Hunter’s laptop being evidence or any of the other alleged Biden missteps.

LETTER: Trump tries to win Nevada

Mr. Trump advocating for tax-free tip income is definitely one approach to winning Nevada. But my tip to Mr. Trump is to pick Marco Rubio and show the diversity of the GOP.

LETTER: Red Rock development ‘compromise’ is depressing

Red Rock Canyon is a fragile natural wonder. To claim that 3,500 homes and the traffic that goes with them, and changing the nature of the watershed, will not negatively impact the area is absurd.