67°F
weather icon Mostly Cloudy

LETTER: Does Trump have a hidden agenda with labor secretary pick?

In response to your Monday editorial about Donald Trump’s selection for secretary of labor:

I am a little confused about the statement that unions supported Mr. Trump. As far as I know, most labor groups endorsed Kamala Harris and Democrats, as we all know they support most union laws and rights.

Although Mr. Trump surprisingly selected a (somewhat) pro-labor former congresswoman to head the Department of Labor, it is assumed Mr. Trump has a hidden agenda in doing so.

Other than border patrol and some police unions, no major unions supported Mr. Trump. His NLRB choices will tell a different story.

As for the PRO Act, it is simply logic and common sense that if you choose to work in a union and receive the union package — better overall wages either in pay or benefits or both — you should pay dues. The dues doesn’t even come close to what you lose in a non-union house. Stop free-loading in a union house and pay for those wages earned by someone fighting on your behalf.

THE LATEST
LETTER: Democrats vow to obstruct the Trump administration

Democrats are showing their true colors by not losing with grace and character, understanding why they lost and taking steps within the party to improve their image and actions.

LETTER: UNLV’s great football season

Two UNLV coaches fail to finish the job with the players with two weeks remaining in the season.

LETTER: Steven Horsford, fiscal hawk?

Now a member of the Department of Government Efficiency caucus, where has he been for the past four years?