93°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Global warming fight must involve mining

Steve Sebelius’ May 7 column amplifies the disconnect between developing materials necessary for us to move away from fossil fuels and our desire to preserve the environment for future generations. On the one hand, environmentalists work to eliminate sources of greenhouse gases to abate the effects of climate change. On the other hand, environmentalists work to preserve the environment as we know it.

Nearly everything that is needed to prevent a warming Earth, by necessity, must come out of the Earth. Recovering minerals can take place only where those minerals are found in the Earth. As with everything material in life, mining comes at some cost. With mining the cost is twofold. There is cost to the environment and the cost of mineral extraction. Neither can be avoided.

Preserving the environment, without mining, will cost us in many ways. What cost will there be as droughts grow, rain patterns change and more air conditioning becomes necessary. A warming climate will have a serious effect on agriculture. The list is endless.

Former water chief Pat Mulroy said it best: “Those who seek to protect the environment by opposing solutions will find they are destroying the very environment they seek to protect.”

THE LATEST
LETTER: Biden confused over inflation.

All this mismanagement has resulted in the national debt rising at a very alarming rate.

LETTER: Still after the Jan. 6 protesters

So more than three years after the riot, the government is still using taxpayer money and manpower in its vendetta to ferret out Donald Trump supporters.

LETTER: Columbia kids need to learn to pay their own way

Frankly, if I had kids at Columbia who participated in these “protests,” I’d yank them out of school, toss their stuff onto the lawn and tell them to get a job, go live in the real world and pay your own way.

LETTER: Here’s the real threat to democracy

In the 2020 election, Mr. Biden ran on promises he has failed to keep. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

LETTER: No need for an SOS on Social Security

The functional reality is that members of Congress need to keep Social Security alive or they will be voted out of office.