83°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Lands bill would exacerbate sprawl in Las Vegas area

I was shocked to read, “Lands bill would trade conservation for development” in Friday’s Review-Journal. Specifically, Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto asserting the Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act would “combat climate change” and “prevent sprawl.” How can selling off 42,000 acres of our federal public lands for development do either?

Increasing Las Vegas’ footprint by more than 65 square miles is the definition of sprawl. The associated development, vehicles and emissions they would bring will add more carbon to the air, making climate change worse. The so-called “affordable housing” is also to be located in areas with little or no infrastructure or in high-dollar development areas.

Our recent record heat waves in Las Vegas are a taste of what’s to come if we do not stop emitting carbon dioxide. Sen. Cortez Masto and other politicians are dooming our region to a worst-case heat and pollution scenario if they keep pursuing development without regard to impact, such as what’s being proposed in this bill. Isn’t this “desert denial”?

THE LATEST
LETTER: Criminals make us change our habits

In response to your Saturday story on credit card skimming: I was a scammed three times at the gas pumps.

LETTER: Rail line to California

This is progress? Four years and billions of dollars to build a roughly 200-mile stretch of rail from California to Nevada.

LETTER: Misinformation on inflation

The Biden administration is going all out to convince people that inflation is not as bad as it really is.

LETTER: A Trump-Biden cage debate

I would love to see a debate between our two presumptive presidential candidates. Just the two of them, one-on-one.

LETTER: Groundbreaking on a rail line to California

I’m voting against every politician who — in the picture at the groundbreaking shown in the Review-Journal — celebrated pouring our tax money down the drain.

LETTER: Nevada’s open space is a gift

The governor’s suggestion to release more of Nevada’s federally owned land is a form of federal spending and diminishes Nevada’s gift of open space.