60°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: The nature of science is to be progressive

In response to Jonah Goldberg’s Wednesday column, “The science of intellectual tribalism”:

It is the job of scientists and scholars of every kind to push knowledge forward and reject the traditional thinking in their fields of study. Therefore, it is the nature of science to be progressive — and this is exactly why people who are educated in the universities of the world are progressive.

You cannot have modern medicine, the MRI, the computer, the internet and men in space or robots without people who think about what is not known instead of holding on only to what is known.

Individual scientists may be conservative financially and many may be socially conservative, but none of those who are successful are intellectually conservative. Anti-intellectualism gets us nowhere and being anti-progressive gets us nowhere. If David Gelernter, Trump’s potential pick for science advisor, is anti-intellectual, then he is exactly the wrong person for the job.

THE LATEST
LETTER: Do our politicians care what we think?

Don’t expect much, if anything, from our elected officials. Then you won’t be let down when their performance is less than stellar.

LETTER: Library director gets slap on the wrist

The executive director of the Las Vegas-Clark County Library District accepted free Super Bowl tickets and must undergo ethics training.

LETTER: The voters have spoken

Trump should compromise with the radical progressives.

LETTER: Donald Trump has work to do

Former President Donald Trump will be returning to the White House for another four-year term.