58°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Those deceptive ads about Question 3

I read with dismay the Review-Journal’s recent editorial on Question 3. I had no idea that Question 3 actually represented “ranked-choice” voting. The TV ads sure put a different spin on it, talking only about open primaries. I think there should have been advertising to refute those ads and explain the real damage that would be done if Question 3 passes.

I don’t think the measure would win the popular vote if people really understood what it was all about. As it stands, I’m afraid the friendly, clean-cut people on television touting the benefit of voting “yes” will have no trouble winning the battle.

THE LATEST
LETTER: Can’t we all just get along?

Funny how, when the left is no longer in power, they want to play nice in the sandbox.

LETTER: Donald Trump and Bizzaro World

The criminal-elect has nominated a fellow criminal to investigate criminals.

LETTER: It’s a jungle on our roads

I am considering a bumper sticker that reads “Slow down, the coroner will wait.”

LETTER: Colleges have become daycare centers

Georgetown offered Legos, coloring at a post-election day “Self-Care Suite” for students to deal with “stressful times.”

LETTER: Star-struck Nevada lawmakers

The legislation, as proposed, calls for $1.9 billion in taxpayer subsidies over 20 years. It will create a “projected” 7,500 jobs? That’s $253,330 taxpayers will pay for each job.