94°F
weather icon Clear

Review-Journal shines light on city annexation proposal

Thank you for the Review-Journal’s excellent and timely reporting on the annexation issue (“Annex this: County offers help fighting plan,” Jan. 18). My family lives in a county island. The city never asked if we wanted to be annexed, nor did they send notification that we will be forced into this fight to protect our way of life. It seems as if the city wants county landowners to be the last to know about their proposal.

After reading about the plan in the RJ, I contacted a city planner and was told my property address is within the 872 acres involved in the city’s annexation proposal.

The antiquated Nevada Revised Statutes the city says they are following need to be changed. But, for now, county residents will have to fight this. More than half of the 1,500 property owners affected will quickly have to notify the city that we oppose their plan.

Without the RJ’s coverage, many residents would have likely found out after it was too late to effectively fight this life-changing proposal.

THE LATEST
LETTER: A dangerous combination

Donald Trump and Sam Brown are extremists. These are two men who would sooner throw your vote away if it’s not for them.

LETTER: Missing the mark

These so-called CBO budget experts, if in the private sector, would be put out on the streets for their incompetence.

LETTER: Just sign here

Isn’t it fascinating that signatures are excruciatingly validated and litigated when it comes to appearing on the ballot, but ignored once the actual voting takes place?

LETTER: Investing in news

Review-Journal interns offer hope.

LETTER: Glass houses

Both sides of the road are filled with potholes of corruption.

LETTER: Trump owes an apology

Trump has never conceded. There is no proof that the election was illegitimate or voter fraud was an issue. Where is his and his party’s apology?