97°F
weather icon Clear

Senate will remain dysfunctional until we get rid of the filibuster

There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution about the Senate filibuster. It is simply a rule adopted by the Senate — which, in my opinion, thinks it is the House of Lords — to make it difficult to change the status quo. Everyone knows that if the Democrats regain control of the Senate, they will abolish it.

The Senate is supposed to operate under Robert’s Rules of Order, commonly known as parliamentary procedure, which strictly forbids filibusters. The Republicans were able to barely pass the tax reform bill by using reconciliation, but that is allowed only once in a fiscal year. It will be almost impossible to get anything done in the future in today’s political climate unless this ridiculous and unconstitutional (in the sense that there is nothing in the Constitution about it) rule be abolished.

THE LATEST
LETTER: A dangerous combination

Donald Trump and Sam Brown are extremists. These are two men who would sooner throw your vote away if it’s not for them.

LETTER: Missing the mark

These so-called CBO budget experts, if in the private sector, would be put out on the streets for their incompetence.

LETTER: Just sign here

Isn’t it fascinating that signatures are excruciatingly validated and litigated when it comes to appearing on the ballot, but ignored once the actual voting takes place?

LETTER: Investing in news

Review-Journal interns offer hope.

LETTER: Glass houses

Both sides of the road are filled with potholes of corruption.

LETTER: Trump owes an apology

Trump has never conceded. There is no proof that the election was illegitimate or voter fraud was an issue. Where is his and his party’s apology?