The woke/DEI project is enticing thousands of shysters, careerists and mediocrities
- Home
- >> Opinion
- >> Opinion Columns
Victor Davis Hanson
Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and the author of “The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won,” from Basic Books. You can reach him by e-mailing authorvdh@gmail.com. His columns appears Sundays in the Review-Journal.
The more democratic and defensive the power, the more Americans support it — but only up to a point.
Exposing the myths.
When will the left cease destroying immigration law?
America needs to recalibrate its priorities to protect the lives and aspirations of all its citizens, regardless of their race and gender.
The only thing worse than an armistice with no clear winner or loser is an endless war with more than a million casualties.
Societies do not always collapse from a lack of wealth, invasion or natural catastrophes.
One state prosecutor and one civilian plaintiff have already won huge fines and damages from Donald Trump that may, with legal costs, exceed $500 million.
The Ukrainian and Israeli wars are similar and yet also different conflicts — but in more ways than we can imagine.
Still, it remains somewhat unclear why Biden and his Homeland Security chief destroyed what Trump had achieved. Why would they ensure such misery for both American hosts and millions of illegal immigrants?
If the administration must speak, Washington should do so by conveying disproportionality and unpredictability.
Her rope-a-dope strategy could be to remain a “backup” candidate.
Sometimes real, sometimes hyped crises lead to these contrived left-wing hysterias — such as the Jan. 6, 2021, violent “armed insurrection” or the “fascist” “ultra-MAGA” threat.
Democrats are tearing apart the country in a manner not seen since the Civil War era — apparently convinced democracy cannot be trusted and so itself must be sacrificed as the price of destroying Trump.
Former President Claudine Gay’s removal is not the end of Harvard’s dilemma. Rather, it is the beginning.