90°F
weather icon Clear

The Second Amendment and criminals

Again, there is confusion over the Second Amendment, as is evident by Richard L. Strickland’s July 12 letter to the editor.

Very simply stated, the Second Amendment provides that law-abiding American citizens may possess firearms to protect themselves and their family from imminent death or grave bodily injury by another person or persons.

Those people who use a firearm under circumstances of “road rage,” “party rage,” “fence rage” or “bar rage” are criminals. The way you know about these “rage criminals” is that you see or hear on the news when they are arrested and prosecuted as criminals.

Also, do not confuse law-abiding Americans who purchase firearms legally and use them at ranges or for protection with those who obtain firearms illegally and use them in crimes.

Stopping criminals or irrational people from obtaining firearms is a serious problem. However, one should not confuse this issue with the rights guaranteed law-abiding American citizens under the Second Amendment.

THE LATEST
LETTER: Tired rhetoric on green energy

Nevadans should look west to California, where 100 percent of that huge state’s energy was recently supplied by renewable sources for a stretch of more than nine hours.

LETTER: Biden confused over inflation.

All this mismanagement has resulted in the national debt rising at a very alarming rate.

LETTER: Still after the Jan. 6 protesters

So more than three years after the riot, the government is still using taxpayer money and manpower in its vendetta to ferret out Donald Trump supporters.

LETTER: Columbia kids need to learn to pay their own way

Frankly, if I had kids at Columbia who participated in these “protests,” I’d yank them out of school, toss their stuff onto the lawn and tell them to get a job, go live in the real world and pay your own way.

LETTER: Here’s the real threat to democracy

In the 2020 election, Mr. Biden ran on promises he has failed to keep. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

LETTER: No need for an SOS on Social Security

The functional reality is that members of Congress need to keep Social Security alive or they will be voted out of office.