75°F
weather icon Clear

The numbers behind Nevada’s school funding

In his July 18 column, Victor Joecks did make two accurate statements about education funding worth acknowledging. He said, “Education spending in Nevada keeps going up, but the Clark County School District keeps complaining it doesn’t get enough.” Both of these are true statements.

According to state reporting on NevadaReportCard.com, per-pupil expenditures in the Clark County School District increased from $6,031 to $8,520 from 2005 to 2015, outpacing inflation by almost $1,200. Still, the district — with all of the needs of a large, urban district — receives less per pupil than any other district in Nevada.

Unfortunately, the headline and opening sentence were misleading and only a small part of the real story.

The real story is that, while progress has been made through categorical funding approved by the 2015 and 2017 legislatures and the governor, Nevada and the Clark County School District still have a long way to go toward adequately funding education. According to the most recent national data from 2015, of the 50 largest school districts in the United States, only Wake County, N.C. ($8,205) and Alpine, Utah ($5,724) receive less per pupil than Clark County ($8,254). Similarly, the national average funding per pupil in 2015 was $11,392. That’s a difference of $3,138 per pupil for Clark County and $2,816 for Nevada. That’s a lot of ground to cover just to qualify as average.

Some might say that we just don’t have the resources in Nevada to adequately fund education. Unfortunately, that is also not accurate. Ranked according to spending on education per $1,000 of personal income, Nevada is No. 40 in the United States at $37.80. Nevada has the ability to adequately fund schools, but chooses not to.

All of this adds up to Nevada being close to the bottom in education in another key metric. We are ranked No. 45 in per-pupil spending. It is nothing short of miraculous and a testament to our strategic priorities that Nevada is ranked No. 18 in teacher salaries. At least we know to spend the little money we have to attract quality instructors to the classroom where it matters most.

The Clark County School District has a money problem, as Victor Joecks quipped, but it is a revenue problem. Let’s be clear and fair about that. We don’t know if money will fix Nevada’s education problems. We have never really tried.

THE LATEST
LETTER: Tired rhetoric on green energy

Nevadans should look west to California, where 100 percent of that huge state’s energy was recently supplied by renewable sources for a stretch of more than nine hours.

LETTER: Biden confused over inflation.

All this mismanagement has resulted in the national debt rising at a very alarming rate.

LETTER: Still after the Jan. 6 protesters

So more than three years after the riot, the government is still using taxpayer money and manpower in its vendetta to ferret out Donald Trump supporters.

LETTER: Columbia kids need to learn to pay their own way

Frankly, if I had kids at Columbia who participated in these “protests,” I’d yank them out of school, toss their stuff onto the lawn and tell them to get a job, go live in the real world and pay your own way.

LETTER: Here’s the real threat to democracy

In the 2020 election, Mr. Biden ran on promises he has failed to keep. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

LETTER: No need for an SOS on Social Security

The functional reality is that members of Congress need to keep Social Security alive or they will be voted out of office.